Skip to content

This is the fourth article in the Future of Investing series, drawing insights from our annual industry-wide survey.1 Please refer to The Future of Investing: 2024/25 Edition—Overview for a summary of the key findings as well as other preceding articles.

Preview

Since the emergence of “Modern Portfolio Theory” and the “Capital Asset Pricing Model” in the late 1960s, institutional investors have taken a quantitatively driven approach to portfolio construction, looking to create portfolio diversification and obtain better risk-adjusted returns by balancing their asset-class exposures. This journey has seen several important advancements in thinking about how to optimally achieve desired results and has provided a roadmap for those servicing retail investors, as illustrated in the following exhibit.

Exhibit 1: Evolution of Portfolio Construction

Source: Franklin Templeton Industry Advisory Services. For illustrative purposes only.

Originally, institutions determined a target global asset allocation that distributed capital across actively managed equity and bond exposures. The target asset allocation would serve as the benchmark (using index benchmarks for returns) to determine overall portfolio outperformance. The emergence of Fama and French’s factor model in the 1990s created a more detailed perspective on the contributors to performance. This eventually led to the groupings of funds in style-box-aligned equity and bond funds (or managed accounts). The ability to build portfolios using these exposure categories represented a bottom-up approach. The selected portfolio managers were expected to deliver both beta—market returns within their style—and alpha—outperformance relative to that constrained benchmark.

Over time, asset managers took a variety of approaches to the style-box benchmarks, with some choosing to systematically replicate only the market returns of the style box, i.e., excluding alpha, resulting in lower cost to the client. As competition drove down fees, this became a very economic basis on which to build a portfolio.

Download the complete PDF to continue reading about the future of asset management in optimizing portfolio returns with new investing models.

For more information or to request a presentation on the 2024/25 Future of Investing findings, please contact your Franklin Templeton representative or reach us directly at [email protected]



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.