Skip to content

In this episode of the Alternative Allocations podcast, I discussed the growth and evolution of secondaries with Taylor Robinson of Lexington Partners. We discussed how secondaries have emerged as a vital piece in the private equity ecosystem, providing much-needed liquidity to institutions. Taylor highlighted the importance of size and scale in executing secondary transactions, and emphasized the importance of acquiring quality assets at reasonable prices to help achieve desired returns.

Taylor and I discussed the changes in the market environment over the last several years. The capital raised leading up to 2021, coupled with slowing exits in recent years, has created a real need for liquidity in the marketplace. Secondary managers have provided much-needed liquidity at discounts to the underlying valuations. Taylor was careful to point out that he’s not buying an asset based solely on their discount. “The discount is really a reflection of what we think the go-forward and terminal value is for the assets we're purchasing and the return we want to earn to take on that exposure.”  

We discussed the historical dispersion of returns between public and private market investments. The dispersion of returns between the top and bottom quartile large- and mid-cap funds is roughly 5%; while the dispersion of returns between the top and bottom private equity (PE) fund is over 45%, and nearly 50% for venture capital funds. The dispersion of returns for secondary funds is approximately 22%, eliminating the extreme highs and lows of PE.

Private and Public Market Return Dispersion

As of June 30, 2024.

Source: MSCI Private Capital Solutions, Morningstar.

The returns for US Large and Mid Cap Active Equity Funds reflect the annualized returns for the period January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2024. The returns for Secondaries, Private Equity, Venture Capital (VC), and Private Debt are the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the funds with vintage years from 2005 to 2018, as of June 30, 2024. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.

Taylor emphasized the structural advantages of secondaries—shortening the J-Curve,1 providing distributions sooner, and the diversification benefits (general partners, vintage, geography, and industry). I asked Taylor to discuss how institutions use secondaries. Institutions will often have regularly scheduled secondary programs to diversify their holdings and free up capital for future commitments. They may also use as an “on-ramp” to build positions and/or to maintain exposure.

Taylor noted that, “Secondary sits somewhere between direct private equity and credit in the risk spectrum because it's an equity strategy, but it has broad diversification. You have the benefit of buying assets later in their life, and you can see performance when we buy these portfolios in the companies.”  

I shared the Institute’s outlook for 2025, and our views regarding the attractiveness of the secondary market. Taylor added that, “this is an attractive time to invest because I think we are buying really great assets at reasonable valuations.”

If you missed this, or any of the Alternative Allocation podcasts, don’t forget to subscribe wherever you get your podcast so you don’t miss future episodes, and remember to rate and review to help us improve.



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that a strategy will meet its objective. Performance may also be affected by currency fluctuations. Reduced liquidity may have a negative impact on the price of the assets. Currency fluctuations may affect the value of overseas investments. Where a strategy invests in emerging markets, the risks can be greater than in developed markets. Where a strategy invests in derivative instruments, this entails specific risks that may increase the risk profile of the strategy. Where a strategy invests in a specific sector or geographical area, the returns may be more volatile than a more diversified strategy.

If you would like information on Franklin Templeton’s retail mutual funds, please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.